No Bad Days Viii iPhone Case - Online

Our iPhone Slim Case combines premium protection with brilliant design. The slim profile keeps your tech looking sleek, while guarding against scuffs and scratches. Just snap it onto the case and you’re good to go.Extremely slim profile, One-piece build: flexible plastic hard case, Open button form for direct access to device features, Impact resistant, Easy snap on and off, iPhone 8, 8 Plus, and X cases support QI wireless charging (case doesn’t need to be removed).

The shift comes as Google, the world's largest Internet search site, heads into a major transformation. The company said Monday that it is restructuring itself as a new entity called Alphabet, splitting up Google's core products like search and YouTube from more nascent efforts like driverless cars and smart contact lenses. The Advanced Technology and Projects division, which developed Project Ara, will remain part of Google even after the reorganization. Google has increasingly preached a message of cutting costs. The company's new chief financial officer, Ruth Porat, who will become CFO of Alphabet, said on a conference call in July that the company sought to curb expenses.

The Ara announcement came initially as a string of posts on its official Twitter account on Thursday, The company described the shift as a "market pilot re-route" and said it is just "recalculating" its approach, The search no bad days viii iphone case giant says it's "recalculating" its strategy for its effort to create phones with interchangeable parts, Google's got a change of plans for its build-it-yourself smartphone initiative, Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic, We delete comments that violate our policy, which we encourage you to read, Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion..

The US Federal Circuit Court of Appeals decided on Thursday that it would not grant Samsung's request for a new trial on whether nearly two dozen of the company's mobile devices infringed on Apple's design patents, according to San Jose Mercury News, which obtained a copy of the decision. If Samsung's request had been granted, a new hearing would have been held to determine whether the company's products actually violated Apple's patents. But since it has lost, Samsung must either dole out hundreds of millions of dollars in damages to Apple or attempt to have the US Supreme Court to hear the case, the report says.

"We are disappointed that our request for an en banc hearing of the US Court of Appeals was denied," a Samsung spokesperson said in an e-mailed statement, "For decades, we have invested heavily in developing revolutionary innovations in the mobile industry and beyond, no bad days viii iphone case We are confident that our products do not infringe on Apple's design patents, and we will continue to take appropriate measures to protect our products and our intellectual property."Apple declined to comment on the court's decision, but has charged in the past that Samsung "willfully stole our ideas and copied our products."Samsung's loss could prove to be the final say on the company's bid to overturn a ruling in 2012 that found Samsung violated Apple's design patents across its smartphone and tablet line, The company was initially required to pay over $1 billion in damages, but that figure has since been pared down to $548 million after a series of hearings and appeals..

In 2011, Apple filed a lawsuit against Samsung, accusing it of violating several patents in the design of its mobile devices. Apple won the trial in 2012, with the jury awarding it $1.05 billion in damages. In March 2013, US District Court Judge Lucy Koh cut $450.5 million off those damages, but in November 2013, a jury awarded Apple an additional $290.5 million in damages, ultimately amounting to approximately $930 million. Samsung appealed the decision, and in May (PDF), the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the violations concerning design patents but struck down certain damages related to trade dress, a legal term that refers to the way a product is packaged or presented. The decision reduced the amount of damages owed by Samsung to $548 million.

The Circuit Court's ruling may also prove to be troubling to several Silicon Valley companies, including Google, Facebook, eBay, and PC makers Dell and Hewlett-Packard, that together filed a brief with the federal court in July, Those companies argued that Apple's victory no bad days viii iphone case in 2012 against Samsung covered only minor technologies, adding that if upheld, the infringement could set off a ripple effect that could negatively affect companies attempting to develop "useful modern technologies.""If allowed to stand, that decision will lead to absurd results and have a devastating impact on companies..who spend billions of dollars annually on research and development for complex technologies and their components," the companies said in a statement to the court filed on July 1..

The issues with Samsung and Apple date back to 2011 when the companies sued each other in the US, a host of countries in the European Union, and Asia. Both Apple and Samsung argued that the other was violating patents each held related to mobile technology. Over the years, the companies' top products -- including Apple's iPhone and iPad line, as well as Samsung's Galaxy line -- were entangled in the proceedings. Both companies hoped to ban the sale of allegedly infringing products and receive damages on their sale.

The international cases Apple and Samsung were waging were scuttled last year after the companies decided to only face off in US court, Still, the war continues in the US, Last year, Apple won an additional $119.6 million in a separate infringement case, That case proved to not be as one-sided as the decision in 2012, Apple no bad days viii iphone case had sought far more in damages and asked US District Court Judge Lucy Koh who has presided over the cases, to ban the sale of Samsung's allegedly infringing products, Judge Koh denied the request, saying that "Apple has not demonstrated that it will suffer irreparable harm to its reputation or goodwill as an innovator without an injunction."That case is currently in appeals..

Recent Posts